HAM-AI for objective tip-control assessment
Andrea Sorge·Padua
HAM is built on peer-reviewed validation across stratification, skill improvement, AI scoring, and clinical-grade translation. The studies below are what reviewers, programs, and funders cite when adopting HAM.
HAM at the European endoscopy meetings.
Andrea Sorge·Padua
Three peer-reviewed studies validating the HAM method.
First validation of objective HAM scoring against expert raters in a clinical-grade tip-control task.
Stratifies trainees, standard endoscopists, and interventional specialists across four progressive shapes.
AI scoring shows comparable performance to human raters, enabling scalable assessment at scale.
Endoscopic tip control is a foundational skill — and until HAM, there was no cheap, objective, reproducible way to measure it. HAM gives every endoscopy unit, anywhere in the world, the tools to assess competence honestly. Better measurement leads to better training. Better training leads to safer patients.
Use these snippets when citing HAM in your protocol, manuscript, or grant application.
Debels L, Tate DJ, et al. Validity evidence for an objective scoring tool for endoscopic tip control during snare tip soft coagulation. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2026.
@article{debels2026ham,
title = {Validity evidence for an objective scoring tool for endoscopic tip control during snare tip soft coagulation},
author = {Debels, Lynn and Tate, David J. and others},
journal = {Frontline Gastroenterology},
year = {2026}
}Running a study? Bringing HAM to your unit? Email Lynn to discuss.
Email Lynn Deleu